Cyprus' leading on-line resource for home buyers & real estate investors -

18th April 2024
Cyprus Property News logo
HomeArticlesA simple warning on loan restructuring

A simple warning on loan restructuring

corruptionONE of the largest loan takers in Bank of Cyprus – a land developer – today owes the bank 457 million euro. In an internal audit carried out at the beginning of the crisis, the bank noted that he had not serviced any of his loans – including interest – since 2009. Provisions? None.

There are several such cases in Bank of Cyprus and in the mess formerly known as Laiki Bank, which was absorbed by Bank of Cyprus (BoC) in March. Overall, according to the internal audit, the problematic loans, corporate NPLs with little hope of resurrection, were covered by provisions at 40%.

All hope rests on collateral prices, pumped up and overstated through the years of the bubble, and stubbornly propped up by a strange rule of the Land Registry Department which regularly records prices on real estate that are higher than those recorded in transactions: You sell a house for, say 250 thousand euro and the Land Registry Department records the “going price” at a higher level, say 300 thousand.

This, on top of the traditionally elevated prices recorded by real estate brokers who, not only had to protect their clients (the banks) by overstating the value of collateral so they could give higher loans and protect market shares, but also got paid on commission based on the value of the transactions.

This sort of cronyism is not a “Cypriot” phenomenon, of course. We’ve seen artificial prices, connected lending, overstated collateral and loan “restructuring” that makes no sense before, not the least in the Asian crisis.

But at this point, BoC is being resolved itself, and the main thinking behind the next moves, is to form a hybrid (some might say mutant) form of an Asset Management Company (AMC) to absorb bad loans, restructure them and sell off collateral over time. The merits of an AMC, avoiding fire sales and preserving value, are rather self-evident.

The real problem in BoC, however, remains the track record of the bank, and the attitude maintained (formally and behind-the-scenes) by decision makers controlling the bank. When you owe the bank 457 million (or 335 million, for that matter, or 198 million still), the issue is not only that the bank has a problem – the issue is that half of the political elite is also at your feet, as they were when you were financing campaigns.

While the details of the AMC are still foggy, and any serious commentary on this decision should rest on the details, where, after all, the devil lies, one thing is clear: Loan restructuring is meant to preserve value and rescue good loans that are under temporary stress. What is it not meant to be, is a trick to rescue bad businesses by evergreening their obligations, by lengthening their repayment period, providing payment holidays on the principal and lowering interest payments.

In other words, loan restructuring is supposed to preserve/rescue value, not cook the books.

The danger in BoC is the very pathology that brought the bank to the brink – bad loans that were covered by extending yet more bad loans; connected lending to companies “related” to the Board that were then repeatedly rolled over so that NPL rates would appear lower and, finally, crony lending that only an eight year old would extend to companies that, for years, appeared entirely beyond salvation.

At the same time, official land price levels remain unrealistically high, not the least because of a policy followed by the Land Registry Department that is on the verge of outright corruption.

After all, a “businessman” who owes almost half a billion euro for projects in developing land in the middle of nowhere (eg Paphos), and who couldn’t make his payments during the era of the “fatted cows”, can’t be expected to turn things around under current conditions.

And this is a dire warning for Cyprus today, as decision makers continue to deny that the largest loans extended were problematic at all, trying (apparently) to protect large campaign donors from destruction. One, in fact, wanders if Alvarez and Marsal will continue to accommodate this policy, given the absolute control that Central Bank senior staff say it exercises over the Governor who appears paralyzed like a deer in the headlights of the crisis…

BoC can still be saved – but more of the same virus will certainly spell much worse illness to come for Cyprus, unless Central Bank (and Alvarez) start doing their job better.

Editor’s comments

Readers may find the original article on the ‘forthisisland’ blog at A simple warning on loan restructuring.

RELATED ARTICLES

9 COMMENTS

  1. Janner, you would be totally correct in your assertion, if the same rules were likely to be applied to both you and the Developer in question.

    I’m thinking that there may be a vague, outside possibility that this will not be the case.

  2. Hi Janner

    I don’t know you or the Developer in question but the difference here is, I assume, that you and your few quid are easy picking (pray on the weak with no political contacts) or put it another “yes they would”

    Phil

  3. If they don’t chase the developer for half a billion, surely they won’t chase me just for a few quid then!

  4. ONE of the largest loan takers in Bank of Cyprus – a land developer – today owes the bank 457 million euro. In an internal audit carried out at the beginning of the crisis, the bank noted that he had not serviced any of his loans – including interest – since 2009.

    “Did the bank ever chase him”? (Think Not)

    “After all, a “businessman” who owes almost half a billion euro for projects in developing land in the middle of nowhere (eg Paphos), and who couldn’t make his payments during the era of the “fatted cows”, can’t be expected to turn things around under current conditions”.

    Or

    Was it a case of “He could service his loans” but that no one from the bank had the nerve to chase/pressuring him or freezing/foreclosing his account, so why pay.

    I rest my case

    Phil

  5. @Gavin Jones.

    As an avid reader of this and the CM it is sure good to see you back.

    “At the same time, official land price levels remain unrealistically high, not the least because of a policy followed by the Land Registry Department that is on the verge of outright corruption”.

    “Never”

    What we have been saying for years, and fell on deaf ears. They apply this policy when you attempt to pay your taxes (Not interested what you paid/sold for) they decide the value, needless to say it’s always higher.

    Unfortunately, dealing under the table appears to be the standard norm, consequently we ALL get tarred with the same brush.

    Phil

  6. All credit to the author of this piece as it’s a fantastic article and should be required reading.

    It needs to be sent to the Central Bank Governor, the President and all his Ministers and all executives of Cypriot banks.

    Having said that, they won’t read it and even if they did, they wouldn’t act on it.

  7. Surely the money can be traced freeze the accounts of offenders these guys are clearly criminals. If they could trace Gaddafi’s wealth all over the world Cyprus can do the same to. Get some credibility back.

  8. Excellent article, succinct, accurate and to the point.

    Another reason for the DLO’s to artificially inflate property prices has been to collect more in Property Transfer Fees so that the State can continue to squander the income from this, that is, of course, if the State ever saw this extra revenue.

Comments are closed.

Top Stories

Sign up to receive our free weekly newsletter

We handle your data responsibly, find more about our privacy policy

Cyprus property transfer fees

Elsewhere in Cyprus Property News

EUR - Euro Member Countries
GBP
1.1685
RUB
0.0101
CNY
0.1287
CHF
1.0291

Property capital gains tax (CGT) calculator