THE MAJORITY of parliamentary parties decided on Monday to press ahead with two bills suspending the entry into force of repossessions-related legislation – but crucially omitted to fix a date for their move.
DIKO MP and House finance committee chairman Nicolas Papadopoulos confirmed the two items would be forwarded to the House plenary for a vote.
But the parties will hold back until after the finance minister has ‘informed’ them as to when the so-called insolvency framework is to be presented to them, he said.
Papadopoulos has written to the finance minister requesting that information.
“Pending the minister’s explanations, the House finance committee will then decide on the date of forwarding the bills to the plenum,” the DIKO leader told reporters.
Two parties, AKEL and EDEK, have submitted bills, the first to suspend implementation of the foreclosures law until July next year, the second to suspend it until the beginning of the year.
It’s understood that a possible suspension of foreclosures legislation in the first half of this month would have complicated the release of the next bailout tranche from international creditors.
Omitting to set a date for a vote on the two contentious bills likely means that no such vote will take place prior to the disbursement of the next aid tranche – due by December 15. At around that time parliament will instead be busy reviewing and voting on the 2015 budget.
In effect, the parties’ decision on Monday seems to have given the administration a free pass by de-linking the aid tranche to the timeline of the so-called insolvency legislation package.
Whereas come the New Year opposition parties may yet move to delay enforcement of the foreclosures law – thus maintaining a semblance of consistency in the eyes of the public – it would be immaterial as far as the bailout tranche goes.
Opposition parties want to suspend the foreclosures law, arguing that as it stands borrowers are left without a safety net. That safety net is the insolvency framework – comprising six bills – the effort being to protect people unable to keep up with mortgage payments because of the downturn and not those who deliberately failed to do so.
The parties’ insistence appears counter-intuitive, given that repossessions of primary residences will not be enforced before the beginning of 2015 when the insolvency framework comes into force.
Papadopoulos however stuck to his mantra that, as long as insolvency legislation is absent, the system is gamed in the banks’ favour, leaving delinquent borrowers at the mercy of lenders.
“They [banks] are already threatening borrowers with mass foreclosures, wanting to pre-empt the enactment of the insolvency framework,” he said.
Last month Finance Minister Harris Georgiades warned MPs to avoid disrupting the island’s bailout programme by passing legislation that was incompatible with the terms.
Back in October eurozone finance ministers endorsed in principle the disbursement of the next aid tranche, finding that Nicosia has amended laws on foreclosures and forced sales of mortgaged property in line with a deal with its international creditors.
But the Eurogroup also added that the payout would be recommended “so long as this situation remained unchanged.”
And so the circus continues and will do so for the next millennia, why would it ever change when the same self serving politico’s are entrenched in various organisations around the world. The only thing seperating them is language. So nothing changes then? I wouldn’t mind betting it was the EU who suggested the delay date in order to enable them to lend us the money, then we can renage on the MOU after we have it and all they need to issue is a short ‘Tut tut, not quite what we had in mind, please present proposals detailing how you will proceed’. We then do nothing until just before the next handout. Good isn’t it? Easy peasy!
If, after this news (assuming its accuracy) regarding the Cypriot intent, the Troika release the next tranche of bail out monies, regardless of any mitigating details undisclosed to the general public, it will send out a very confusing message – one which surely MUST warrant a full and transparent explanation!!
Those of us trapped in this web of deceit and corruption see the constant flouting of this particular deal as a betrayal and are waiting for some positive signs that the EU actually intends to “encourage” Cyprus to sort itself out!
This is in clear defiance of the Cyprus MoU which states that the Cyprus authorities will not introduce any legislation that would frustrate the implementation of the insolvency framework necessary to enable the Troika to release further tranches of bail-out funding.
If Jeroen Dijsselbloem means what he says, he will be stopping the cheque as we speak. The Troika does not take kindly to being jerked around by political gamesmanship being played out by opposition parties hoping that they can delay the legislation and at the same time still enjoy the next EU handout.
It’s not a mad hatters tea party if you’ve been invited to it. It’s a systemic, comprehensive and clear plan to defraud & strip ordinary people of their power and wealth. Sadly – it’s working a treat.
In a last ditch attempt to avoid inevitable civil disorder from eventually taking place – we need to be firm, peaceful but VERY VERY clear we AREN’T going to accept it.
Maybe this is what is at the bottom of it all?
Corporate Europe Observatory – Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU
Up to us to do something about it as this abuse of corporate power will not help many things – including our property issues in Cyprus.
They’re still firmly of the belief that Cyprus is in a different universe, where water runs up hill and stays there all on its own, where the Earth is flat and you fall over the edge if you dare go beyond Paphos, where a simple abracadabra converts water into wine. Oh, and the Troika can be hoodwinked by guile, deception and defiance into handing over tranches of bailout lolly.
The Mad Hatter’s Tea Party.