Cyprus Property News for home buyers & real estate investors in Cyprus

27th January 2022
Cyprus Property News logo
HomeLegal MattersPeyia goes to court over Vassiliou project

Peyia goes to court over Vassiliou project

PEYIA municipality is challenging the government’s decision to issue a planning permit for a massive development on a hillside overlooking Peyia and is taking the town planning department in Nicosia to court.

This is the first time that the local authority has taken such a step.

In the last 18 months, Peyia council has raised documented concerns over the development including height of buildings, possible landslides and flooding, water supply and public access roads.

“We have a large majority decision of the council to make this move. We repeatedly made our position known and have held various discussions for a year and a half, all of which are well documented, and we have serious concerns which were not taken into consideration,” Peyia councillor, Linda Leblanc told the Sunday Mail.

Last week, the mayor of Peyia, Marinos Lambrou signed the necessary documents for the municipality’s lawyers to take the town planning department to court.

Planning permission for the project was granted on July 28, and Peyia authorities were officially informed of the move on August 11. A 75 day deadline to object to the permit started from that date, said Leblanc.

The town planning department is responsible for granting permission for the development, but Peyia is responsible for issuing a building permit.

The project’s developer is former president George Vassiliou and the design, described as a ‘sustainable development project and a near zero energy settlement’, is receiving EU funding from Zero-Plus Project, Directive 2011/92/EU. This is part of the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme which focuses on achieving near zero and positive energy settlements in Europe.

Peyia council has also decided to lodge an official complaint with the European Commission concerning EU funding for the Zero-Plus project.

“How can a hillside be bulldozed for one zero energy house? This is about selling houses and it’s ‘greenwashing’,” she said.

The development is one of the few proposed since changes were introduced to building policy in 2014, concerning the promotion, regulation and control of a new type of development in the countryside which aims to provide increased building efficiency.

The developers describe the project at Ayia Vouni (Sacred Mountain) as green and sustainable. If it goes ahead, it will be built next to the protected Pikni forest. A small part, about five per cent, will also fall within the EU-protected Natura 2000 network. The development will total around 25.5 hectares.

“The development is a considerable size in what remains a natural area,” she said.

The development will include a large residential complex consisting of 145 flats and 129 villas, a health and environmental research and development centre, a rehabilitation centre. It will also include a ‘village centre’ with commercial facilities (such as offices, shops, banks), restaurants and cafes, a sports centre, spa resort and an art gallery.

The proposed project is in an area of outstanding beauty, said Klitos Papastylianou of the ‘initiative for the natural coastline and commons of Cyprus’, adding that they believe that flora and fauna will be endangered as well as six types of habitats, including two primary habitats, although these are out of the Natura 2000 zone.

He said many concerns have been raised over the proposed development by environmentalists and that Peyia held meetings with the authorities, environmental NGOs and residents.

“Broadly, our views are that this is an unsustainable project with significant and irreversible impact on the environment of the area.”

The area proposed for the project falls outside Peyia’s designated building zone, is on a steep slope and will include four storey high apartment blocks.

According to the law, (Chapter 9.6. Consolidated Developments of Large and Multiple Uses) Papastylianou noted that the assessment includes impacts on several fronts including, natural environment, habitat, human beings, flora and fauna, natural landscape, soil, water, climate, archaeology and heritage.

“The landscape will be totally transformed and the impact will be irreversible. Two areas of soil in the geological and geotechnical studies showed significant risk and the landscape has significant cultural value.”

He added that the development would be in two zones, Z1 and Z3. The former is a protected area of nature and forest and although only five per cent of the project would be situated there and not involve any building, it would severely impact the area.

“Ninety five per cent is in Z3, which comes under the protection of the natural environment, this is an area of outstanding natural beauty. It’s problematic on all aspects of the assessment,” he said.

Peyia councillor Andreas Christodouolou, 29, recently elected for the first time as an independent, on the “Peyia Young Initiative” ticket agrees.

“We (Young Initiative), support new developments in the area, but only those which respect the culture, natural environment, flora and fauna and are developed in harmony with the environment. There are several aspects why this proposed development is a huge worry for the village,” he said.

Christodoulou said that these include: a huge negative impact on the environment, including the protected Pikni forest. It would also adversely affect the soil and the water table and there would be problems with the drainage system.

“The planning authority approved the construction of two lakes on the ‘public’ area within the plans and these are at the bottom of the plot, on a slope and the municipality would have to maintain these,” he said.

He added that the construction of the development’s biological treatment plant would sit ‘above’ all of the homes in Peyia, and create a stench for the entire village.

The cost is another aspect, he said, as a water supply would need to be brought into Peyia to satisfy the demand of the new project and there is already a water shortage in Peyia.

“A new water channel would cost around 1.5 million euros to bring water from Kannaviou dam, including the purchase of land in Kathikas to build a large water tank there and the planning authority has not made it clear who has to pay the costs,” he said.

He said that health and safety of the villages, its residents and visitors is paramount and the development would be a gated community with private roads and the people of Peyia would have no access.

“What would happen if there was a fire in the forest, we would need access,” he said.

In addition, the permit was granted for 15 years, when it is usually valid for a three year period and ‘no-one has answered’ how long the construction would take.

“The dust and noise would have a huge impact on the village and the local economy and would create problems for the tourists,” he said.

“This is a fragile protected zone and not suitable for four storey apartment blocks. The action is also discriminatory against locals who are not permitted to develop outside the building areas,” said Leblanc.

Representatives for the Ayia Vouni project said they did not want to comment on any court proceedings being brought by the Peyia council.


  1. Although not a resident of Peyia, I have lived in the local area for over 17 years and know Peya and Pikni Forest quite well.

    It seems irresponsible for anyone to have issued any planning permission to build in this particular area. The forest is a valuable asset and a ‘green lung’ to those who live in Peyia for recreational purposes. The slope on which this development would be built is exceptionally steep.

    Peyia has well known difficulty in maintaining a regular supply of water to its existing residents in Peyia and Coral Bay, How could it supply this huge development of apartments and villas in addition?

    In addition because of unstable soil and rocks on this steep slope how can the risk of land slides, flooding and possible risk in case of an earthquake be averted?

    Where I live near Tala, we are suffering as a result of another unwise decision made a few years ago when permission was given,allegedly by Nicosia Planning, for a mixed development of apartments and a villa to be built on a well known and very unstable slope close to Leptos Kamares Village. Due partly to lack of proper planning the whole development had to be abandoned as it is clearly unsafe.and it has been condemned. No one takes any responsibility and we are forced to live with an entrance road which is threatened by the collapse of the slope and the development which is by and above it.

    This kind of risk should not be inflicted on the town of Peyia and its residents.

    D.M. Gallanders

  2. What an absolute Disgrace. This land is not even in the building zone.

    If anyone else had asked to build up there, they would say no as it’s in agricultural land.

    Vassiliou seems to have been given a green light on everything including EU money.

    An absolute Disgrace, they don’t even care about the people who already live in Peyia and the effect it will have on the area. There is no need for this complex to line Vassiliou’s pockets he can build it in his neighbourhood. Why doesn’t the EU give the money to Paphos council, I’m sure Mr Fethonas the mayor can put it to good use for Paphos.

  3. What about the 5,8 million dollars loan that was written off a few years ago? I guess that’s forgotten like the rest….

  4. It’s hard to believe that any one from the Nicosia Planning Dept could have ever travelled to Peyia and take the trouble to view the site or take into consideration any of the numerous issues that the proposed development would bring to bear on the environment and the local inhabitants.

    What consideration if any has been given to a water supply or indeed sewerage?

    How on earth are any of the planning considerations regarding the environment and the aesthetic effect satisfied?

    Do the developers have some special influence upon the planning department in the capital? Could their be some connection between the applicant and the planners, Is there a case for investigation into whether the decision is Ultra Vires?

    Hopefully these matters will come to light in court.

    Could it be that the developers do not realistically want to build such a large development but would settle for something smaller and gain acceptance for something that would not otherwise not be allowed. Local people would breath a sigh of relief and the developer would be laughing all the way to the bank.

    And if the development were to go ahead, why would it need to be gated. Nothing would hamper more the integration of new residents into the existing community.

Comments are closed.

Sign up to receive our free Cyprus property newsletter

We guarantee that we do not spam and will not divulge your email address to any third party.

Read our privacy policy for more information.

Cyprus property transfer fees

Property capital gains tax (CGT) calculator

EUR - Euro Member Countries

Top Stories